Bruno Fagali is one of the leading lawyers in Brazil who specializes in Administrative Law. The outspoken lawyer has hit the headlines in the last few years for hitting the nail on the head regarding corruption in the country. Bruno Fagali has immense experience as a private advocate where he has served some of the most prominent companies in Brazil.
Bruno Fagali mainly tackles matters regarding Anti-corruption Law, Administrative Law, Regulatory Law, and Electoral Law among others. He also serves as the Corporate Integrity manager with the Nova/SB, one of the largest advertising agencies in Brazil. In his career, Bruno Fagali has portrayed outstanding skills as a legal professional who stands to fight for justice and integrity in our systems.
Bruno Fagali served as a legal representative in Calil, Associados Advocacia. He also gained immense experience while working for three other Legal Institutions in Sao Paulo. Bruno Fagali served as the primary legal representative to concoct while enacting the anti-corruption law for the agency. He has worked with other organizations in a similar manner, which has helped them to put efficient anti-corruption monitoring systems in their organizations. Bruno Fagali has offered his legal services to numerous companies and individuals by representing them in various court cases. Bruno Fagali is one of the most eloquent and outspoken lawyers ever seen in Brazil. He is known to fight for justice as evidenced in numerous court cases that he has won in the past.
Bruno Fagali’s Education Background
Bruno Fagali has spent much of his time seeking knowledge in his areas of expertise. He pursued his bachelor’s degree from the University of Sao Paolo and later on completed a Master degree in Anti-corruption and Administrative Law. Bruno Fagali also completed a bachelor degree in Law from the Pontifical Catholic University in Sao Paulo. Additionally, Bruno furthered his education by enrolling for training in various legal and law sectors.
Bruno Fagali’s multi-lingual abilities
Bruno Fagali can fluently communicate in Spanish dialect, English, Portuguese and French. These skills enable him to interact comfortably with people from diverse backgrounds. Few Brazilian Lawyers can match Bruno Fagali’s skills and expertise. His main dream is to see a nation where Laws are enacted and followed to the letter.
Karl Heideck graduated from Swarthmore College in 2003 with a bachelor’s in english and literature. He later received a juris doctorate with honors from the Beasley School of Law with Temple University in 2009.
Upon graduation, he joined Conrad O’Brien as an associate. Later, he joined Pepper Hamilton. His experiences geared him toward business law. He is currently a member of the prestigious Grant and Eisenhower Law agency in Philadelphia.
His current concentrations are on civil litigation, corporate compliance and risk management assessments. He has also championed class action suits stemming from corporate misconduct. He currently is suing banking giant Wells Fargo on behalf of the City of Philadelphia.
Karl Heideck’s suit alleges that the bank is using a 90 year old banking practice called redlining which systematically denies loan options to certain undesirable homebuyers, usually minorities, in certain neighborhoods. The suit charges that this practice contributes to segregation in direct contradiction of 1968 housing legislation combating the issue. It is also the city’s position that this creates high-crime areas costing more resources to keep people safe.
Read more on Angel.co
When the law was originally past, segregation throughout the country was a real problem that was illustrated by racially divided neighborhoods, and disproportionate distribution of civic resources. Much progress has been made since then. When attention is taken from this effort, unfair practices can creep back up.
When it comes to proving this case, the city may be facing an uphill battle. Damage must be proven to the city through their loan practices and that may be hard to pin on just one lender. Also, the effects may not be as drastic as in the past. The company has responded to the suit by claiming it to be frivolous and without merit. Recently, however, the company made the same claim when they were charged with making bogus accounts in their customers names. On those charges, they were found guilty.
Find more about Karl Heideck: http://www.legaldirectories.com/Heideck-Karl-576691-Atty.aspx